Display
Devanagari is shown only when this page stored it. Harvard-Kyoto and ASCII are generated from the IAST verse.
Vanisource / Original texts
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.7.42
Save this passage to keep a private note on this device. Notes are not sent to Vedawiki.
Cite
Source navigation
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 42
- tathāhṛtaṁ paśuvat pāśa-baddham
- avāṅ-mukhaṁ karma-jugupsitena
- nirīkṣya kṛṣṇāpakṛtaṁ guroḥ sutaṁ
- vāma-svabhāvā kṛpayā nanāma ca
tathāthus — thus; āhṛtambrought in — brought in; paśulike an animal-vatlike an animal — like an animal; pāśatied with ropes-baddhamtied with ropes — tied with ropes; avākwithout a word in his mouth-mukhamwithout a word in his mouth — without a word in his mouth; karmaactivities — activities; jugupsitenabeing heinous — being heinous; nirīkṣyaby seeing — by seeing; kṛṣṇāDraupadī — Draupadī; apakṛtamthe doer of the degrading — the doer of the degrading; guroḥthe teacher — the teacher; sutamson — son; vāmabeautiful — beautiful; svabhāvānature — nature; kṛpayāout of compassion — out of compassion; nanāmaoffered obeisances — offered obeisances; caand — and.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: Draupadī then saw Aśvatthāmā, who was bound with ropes like an animal and silent for having enacted the most inglorious murder. Due to her female nature, and due to her being naturally good and well-behaved, she showed him due respects as a brāhmaṇa.
Aśvatthāmā was condemned by the Lord Himself, and he was treated by Arjuna just like a culprit, not like the son of a brāhmaṇa or teacher. But when he was brought before Śrīmatī Draupadī, she, although begrieved for the murder of her sons, and although the murderer was present before her, could not withdraw the due respect generally offered to a brāhmaṇa or to the son of a brāhmaṇa. This is due to her mild nature as a woman. Women as a class are no better than boys, and therefore they have no discriminatory power like that of a man. Aśvatthāmā proved himself to be an unworthy son of Droṇācārya or of a brāhmaṇa, and for this reason he was condemned by the greatest authority, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and yet a mild woman could not withdraw her natural courtesy for a brāhmaṇa.
Even to date, in a Hindu family a woman shows proper respect to the brāhmaṇa caste, however fallen and heinous a brahma-bandhu may be. But the men have begun to protest against brahma-bandhus who are born in families of good brāhmaṇas but by action are less than śūdras.
The specific words used in this śloka are vāma-svabhāvā, "mild and gentle by nature." A good man or woman accepts anything very easily, but a man of average intelligence does not do so. But, anyway, we should not give up our reason and discriminatory power just to be gentle. One must have good discriminatory power to judge a thing on its merit. We should not follow the mild nature of a woman and thereby accept that which is not genuine. Aśvatthāmā may be respected by a good-natured woman, but that does not mean that he is as good as a genuine brāhmaṇa.