Display
Devanagari is shown only when this page stored it. Harvard-Kyoto and ASCII are generated from the IAST verse.
Vanisource / Original texts
Bhagavad-gītā 2.6
DonateSave this passage to keep a private note on this device. Notes are not sent to Vedawiki.
Cite
Source navigation
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 6
- न चैतद्विद्मः कतरन्नो गरीयो
- यद्वा जयेम यदि वा नो जयेयुः ।
- यानेव हत्वा न जिजीविषामस्-
- तेऽवस्थिताः प्रमुखे धार्तराष्ट्राः ॥६॥
- na caitad vidmaḥ kataran no garīyo
- yad vā jayema yadi vā no jayeyuḥ
- yān eva hatvā na jijīviṣāmas
- te 'vasthitāḥ pramukhe dhārtarāṣṭrāḥ
nanor — nor; caalso — also; etatthis — this; vidmaḥdo we know — do we know; kataratwhich — which; naḥfor us — for us; garīyaḥbetter — better; yatwhether vāwhether — whether; jayemawe may conquer — we may conquer; yadiif — if; vāor — or; naḥus — us; jayeyuḥthey conquer — they conquer; yānthose who — those who; evacertainly — certainly; hatvāby killing — by killing; nanever — never; jijīviṣāmaḥwe would want to live — we would want to live; teall of them — all of them; avasthitāḥare situated — are situated; pramukhein the front — in the front; dhārtarāṣṭrāḥthe sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra — the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra.
Nor do we know which is better—conquering them or being conquered by them. If we killed the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, we should not care to live. Yet they are now standing before us on the battlefield.
Arjuna did not know whether he should fight and risk unnecessary violence, although fighting is the duty of the kṣatriyas, or whether he should refrain and live by begging. If he did not conquer the enemy, begging would be his only means of subsistence. Nor was there certainty of victory, because either side might emerge victorious. Even if victory awaited them (and their cause was justified), still, if the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra died in battle, it would be very difficult to live in their absence. Under the circumstances, that would be another kind of defeat for them. All these considerations by Arjuna definitely proved that not only was he a great devotee of the Lord but he was also highly enlightened and had complete control over his mind and senses. His desire to live by begging, although he was born in the royal household, is another sign of detachment. He was truly virtuous, as these qualities, combined with his faith in the words of instruction of Śrī Kṛṣṇa (his spiritual master), indicate. It is concluded that Arjuna was quite fit for liberation. Unless the senses are controlled, there is no chance of elevation to the platform of knowledge, and without knowledge and devotion there is no chance of liberation. Arjuna was competent in all these attributes, over and above his enormous attributes in his material relationships.